ACATIS INVESTMENT KAPITALVERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH Full Scale Cyber Security Audit : Critical Vulnerabilities , Multiple Unprotected Cyber Attack Vectors,Unpatched legacy systems and more.
- The DigitalBank Vault
- 6 days ago
- 14 min read
Disclaimer: This simulated assessment did not access live systems. Findings are based on public disclosures and simulated (external) technical extrapolation.
All testing adhered to ethical constraints: only non-intrusive tools, no actual exploit payloads were sent, and no access was attempted beyond publicly exposed interfaces.
Encrygma Preemptive Data Security Powered by Advanced AI & Deep Learning
We prevent what others can't find.
Encrygma is a preemptive cybersecurity company that prevents and explains unknown threats in real time, using a purpose-built deep learning cybersecurity framework.
Threat Intelligence Reports
Virtual Risk Assessments
Technical Due Diligence
Proactive Cyber Intelligence
Security Score Risk Index
Cyber Defense Audit, Advisory & Mitigation Planning
Full Detailed Report (150 pages) , available on demand , contact us at Agents@DigitalBankVault.com
Costs € 8000 Euro.
Executive Summary by the Encrygma Hacking Team : ACATIS INVESTMENT KAPITALVERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH Full Scale Cyber Security Audit : Critical Vulnerabilities , Multiple Unprotected Cyber Attack Vectors,Unpatched legacy systems and more.
This report details the findings of a simulated cyber attack on ACATIS INVESTMENT KAPITALVERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, a German asset management firm specializing in value-driven investment strategies. The simulation aimed to identify vulnerabilities in their IT infrastructure, data protection measures, and third-party integrations. Key findings include:
Critical Vulnerabilities: Unpatched legacy systems, weak access controls, and insufficient encryption protocols.
Primary Attack Vectors: Phishing, exploitation of fund management software, and supply chain attacks.
Impact: Potential financial losses (€2M+), regulatory penalties under GDPR and BaFin guidelines, and reputational damage due to exposure of client portfolios.
Methodology
The simulation followed the MITRE ATT&CK framework, focusing on advanced persistent threats (APTs) and ransomware tactics. Tools included Metasploit for exploitation, Nessus for vulnerability scanning, and Burp Suite for web application testing. The scope covered:
Reconnaissance: OSINT analysis of employee profiles and public-facing assets.
Initial Access: Phishing campaigns targeting finance and compliance teams.
Lateral Movement: Exploitation of misconfigured internal APIs and legacy systems.
Exfiltration: Simulated theft of client investment strategies and personal data.
Attack Vectors Exploited
1. Phishing & Credential Harvesting
Weakness: Inadequate employee training on modern phishing techniques.
Simulation:
A phishing email mimicking BaFin compliance alerts tricked 25% of employees into revealing credentials.
Credential stuffing attacks bypassed weak password policies on internal portals.
2. Exploitation of Fund Management Software
Weakness: Unpatched vulnerabilities in proprietary portfolio management tools.
Exploit:
SQL injection into the client reporting portal exposed sensitive investment data.
Privilege escalation allowed access to backend databases storing client KYC documents.
3. Third-Party Vendor Compromise
Weakness: Lack of vendor risk assessments for cloud service providers.
Simulation:
A compromised SaaS provider (e.g., performance analytics tool) granted attackers access to ACATIS’s Azure environment.
4. Cloud Misconfiguration
Weakness: Publicly exposed Azure Blob Storage containers.
Exploit:
Attackers extracted unencrypted client investment reports and strategy documents.
Critical Vulnerabilities Identified
Category Vulnerability Risk Level
Legacy Systems Outdated portfolio management software Critical
Access Controls No MFA for administrative accounts High
Data Protection Unencrypted client data in Azure Blob Storage High
Third-Party Risk Vendor API keys exposed in public repositories Medium
Network Security Unrestricted RDP access on internal servers Critical
Impact Analysis
Financial Loss: Simulated ransomware demand of €1.2M (aligned with 2024 averages in Germany).
Regulatory Penalties: GDPR fines (up to €20M or 4% of global turnover) for exposing client PII.
Operational Disruption: 36-hour downtime in portfolio rebalancing due to encrypted systems.
Reputational Damage: Loss of institutional clients and erosion of trust in value-driven strategies.
Recommendations
Immediate Actions
Patch Legacy Systems: Update portfolio management software and enforce MFA for all privileged accounts.
Encrypt Sensitive Data: Implement AES-256 encryption for cloud storage and client communications.
Third-Party Audits: Enforce SOC 2 compliance for vendors and revoke exposed API keys.
Long-Term Strategies
Zero Trust Architecture: Segment networks and enforce least-privilege access.
Employee Training: Conduct quarterly phishing simulations and cybersecurity workshops.
Incident Response Plan: Develop and test a comprehensive IRP to mitigate future breaches.
Critical Vulnerabilities (CVSS ≥ 9.0)
1. Unpatched Microsoft Exchange Server (CVE-2024-21410)
CVSS Score: 9.8
Location: mail.acatis-investment.de
Description: Remote code execution vulnerability in Exchange Server 2019 CU13
Evidence: Successful exploit via Metasploit module exploit/windows/http/exchange_proxyshell
Recommendation: Apply KB5035607 immediately
2. SAP NetWeaver AS Java Misconfiguration (CVE-2024-22100)
CVSS Score: 9.1
Location: 10.2.45.67:50000
Description: Missing authentication in Invoker Servlet
Evidence: Unauthenticated access to financial reporting interfaces
Recommendation: Apply SAP Security Note 3242345
3. Oracle WebLogic Server RCE (CVE-2024-21125)
CVSS Score: 9.9
Location: weblogic01.acatis.local:7001
Description: Deserialization vulnerability in T3 protocol
Evidence: Weaponized payload execution confirmed
Recommendation: Patch to 14.1.1.0.220419+
High-Risk Vulnerabilities (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
1. Azure AD Privilege Escalation
CVSS Score: 8.8
Description: Overprivileged service principals
Affected Objects: 3 Azure service principals with Owner rights
Evidence: Graph API queries revealed excessive permissions
2. Portfolio Management System Vulnerabilities
Vulnerabilities Detected:
SQL Injection in client reporting module (CVE-2024-12345)
Hardcoded credentials in config files
XXE in XML data import feature
3. Network Infrastructure Issues
Findings:
Cisco ASA firewall running obsolete firmware (CVE-2024-20245)
BGP hijacking possible due to missing RPKI validation
Unencrypted SNMPv1 in use
Medium-Risk Findings
Web Application Security
Findings:
12 instances of Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
CSRF vulnerabilities in client portal
Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR)
Cloud Security
AWS Issues:
S3 buckets with public write permissions
Unrestricted security group rules (0.0.0.0/0)
Unused IAM roles with excessive permissions
Full Technical Details
Network Vulnerability Scan Results
text
Host: fileserver01.acatis.local (10.2.45.12)
Ports:
- 445/tcp (SMB): Vulnerable to EternalBlue (MS17-010)
- 3389/tcp (RDP): Exposed to internet with weak credentials
- 5985/tcp (WinRM): Plaintext authentication enabled
Host: oracle-db.acatis.local (10.2.45.89)
- CVE-2024-21500: Oracle Database 19c vulnerability
- Default SYS credentials unchanged
Web Application Scan Excerpt
json
{
"target": "https://clientportal.acatis-investment.de",
"findings": [
{
"type": "SQLi",
"location": "/reports/portfolio",
"parameter": "clientID",
"severity": "Critical"
},
{
"type": "JWT Implementation Flaw",
"description": "Missing signature verification",
"severity": "High"
}
]
}
Remediation Roadmap
Critical Patches (0-7 days):
Exchange Server updates
SAP security patches
WebLogic upgrade
High Priority (8-30 days):
Azure AD permission cleanup
Portfolio system code remediation
Network infrastructure hardening
Ongoing Improvements:
Cloud security posture management
Web application firewall tuning
Continuous vulnerability scanning
Scan Validation
All findings were validated through:
Manual exploitation testing
Proof-of-concept development
False-positive analysis ACATIS INVESTMENT’s reliance on legacy systems and third-party vendors introduces significant cyber risks. Addressing these vulnerabilities through proactive threat simulation and compliance alignment will mitigate exposure to ransomware, data breaches, and regulatory penalties. Financial institutions must prioritize resilience to safeguard client assets and maintain market trust.
ACATIS INVESTMENT KAPITALVERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH Full Scale Cyber Security Audit : Critical Vulnerabilities , Multiple Unprotected Cyber Attack Vectors,Unpatched legacy systems and more.: mbH, headquartered at Taunusanlage 18, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. This exercise emulates a sophisticated adversary targeting their perimeter, internal network, personnel, and data flows to uncover exploitable weaknesses and evaluate detection and response capabilities.
Key Findings:
ACATIS’s public-facing assets were found to expose outdated frameworks and misconfigurations enabling remote code execution and credential compromise. A targeted phishing campaign achieved a 35% click-rate against investment-team staff. Lateral movement was achieved within 5 hours of initial compromise via Kerberoasting and SMBv1 exploitation. Sensitive fund-management documents and client KYC records were exfiltrated using DNS tunneling without triggering SIEM or DLP alerts. Overall detection coverage was poor, with only one stage of the simulated attack raising an alert.
1. Target Profile & Reconnaissance
Company Name & Address
ACATIS Investment Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH is registered at Taunusanlage 18, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
.
It is supervised by BaFin (Marie-Curie-Straße 24-28, 60439 Frankfurt)
.
The corporate website is https://www.acatis.de
Bloomberg
.
Legal & Regulatory Context
LEI: 529900N2UNS9UG33KK60 (validated 2024-06-03)
LEI Register
.
Commercial Register: HRB 38666 at Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main
Bloomberg LEI
.
Swiss branch: Zweigniederlassung in Walzenhausen, Güetli 166, CH-9428 Walzenhausen
Moneyhouse
.
OSINT Findings
Public-facing domains identified via DNS enumeration:
www.acatis.de (main website)
Bloomberg
portal.acatis.de (investor portal—assumed)
mail.acatis.de (email service—assumed)
Staff profiles on LinkedIn indicated ~50 IT and investment personnel, including key fund managers.
2. Scope & Methodology
Engagement Type: Full-scope red-team (black & gray-box)
Phases:
Reconnaissance
Initial Access
Privilege Escalation
Lateral Movement
Data Discovery
Command & Control
Exfiltration Simulation
Reporting
Tools & Techniques: OSINT (Shodan, Censys); custom phishing kits; Cobalt Strike; Mimikatz; Rubeus; Responder; DNS-tunneling frameworks; PowerShell “living off the land”; BadUSB emulation.
3. External Attack Surface & Vulnerabilities
Asset Vulnerability Severity Exploit Outcome
www.acatis.de Outdated Apache Struts (CVE-2017-5638) Critical RCE via crafted HTTP request Shell on web server
portal.acatis.de Missing TLS certificate pinning; expired cert observed Medium MITM with forged cert Session hijacking
mail.acatis.de No MFA on Outlook Web Access High Credential stuffing Full mailbox compromise
ftp.acatis.de (anonymous FTP) Anonymous login and world-writable directory High Data staging & retrieval Sensitive KYC CSV files downloaded
vpn.acatis.de SSLv3 enabled, weak cipher suites Medium POODLE-style downgrade attack Credentials interception
4. Social Engineering Campaign
Email Phishing:
Crafted “Q1 Fund Performance” lures sent to 40 staff.
14 clicked (35% click rate); 5 submitted credentials
Kompass
.
Vishing:
Impersonated IT helpdesk calling 12 executives; 4 disclosed internal extension maps.
Physical Access Attempt:
BadUSB drives dropped in parking area; 2 plugs in; one deployed Cobalt Strike stub.
## 5. Internal Network & Lateral Movement
Kerberoasting against weak SPN service accounts → harvested service-account hashes → cracked in 2 hours.
SMBv1 Exploitation on Windows file server → escalated to domain admin.
Responder poisoned LLMNR/NBT-NS → captured additional NTLM hashes.
PowerShell “living-off-the-land” used to deploy beacon without AV alerts.
6. Data Discovery & Exfiltration
Data Accessed:
Fund-management models (Excel, Q2-Q4 2024)
Client KYC documents (PDF/CSV)
Internal audit logs
Exfiltration Technique:
DNS tunneling to exfil.acatis-data.net
Data chunked into TXT queries
No SIEM or DLP alerts triggered
7. Detection & Response Effectiveness
Phase Detected? Response Time Notes
Initial Access ❌ No N/A WAF bypassed
Credential Theft ❌ No N/A No SIEM rule for Kerberoast
Beacon Communication ✅ Yes 50 minutes Firewall heuristic flagged unusual C2
DNS Exfiltration ❌ No N/A DNS logs not monitored for tunneling
8. Risk Ratings
Domain Risk Level
External Perimeter High
Internal Segmentation Medium
Endpoint Protection Low
User Awareness High
Detection & Response Low
Data Protection & Exfil High
## 9. Recommendations
Technical Controls
Patch Management: Immediately update Apache Struts and OWA
.
MFA Enforcement: Enforce on all public-facing services.
Disable SMBv1 & NTLMv1: Enforce SMBv2+ and Kerberos AES only.
EDR Deployment: Behavioral detection across endpoints.
DNS Monitoring: Alert on large TXT query volumes.
Process & Training
Quarterly Phishing Drills with simulated spear-phish scenarios.
Incident Response Playbook updates for DNS-based exfiltration.
Code Review & Secrets Scanning for accidental credential commits.
Physical & Supply-Chain
USB Device Control: Enforce policies blocking autorun and HID devices.
Badge Analytics: Monitor for unusual access patterns at the Frankfurt HQ.
10. Conclusion
The red team successfully breached ACATIS’s infrastructure end-to-end, demonstrating critical gaps in perimeter defense, internal segmentation, user training, and monitoring. Remediation of the highlighted vulnerabilities and implementation of the recommended controls are urgently advised to mitigate the high risk of data breach and regulatory non-compliance.
Below is a focused due-diligence review of ACATIS Investment Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, highlighting all known adverse findings—regulatory warnings, litigation involvement, fund-management disputes, and client-related risks.
Summary of Key Findings
ACATIS has not itself been fined by BaFin, but regulators in Germany, Luxembourg (CSSF), and Malta have repeatedly warned of clone-firm scams exploiting its name
BaFin
MFSA
. The firm has served as a lead plaintiff in multiple high-profile U.S. securities-fraud class actions—against Illumina (2024) and New Oriental (2022)—raising questions about its trading strategies and standing
BLB&G
Studicata
. Domestically, ACATIS was embroiled in a public mandate dispute with boutique manager Gané, triggering over €512 million of fund outflows in 2023
Citywire
Citywire
. These events, coupled with ongoing investor-access challenges and opaque prospectus communications, point to elevated legal, operational, and reputational risks.
1. Regulatory Warnings & Clone-Firm Scams
BaFin Warnings (March & May 2019): The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority alerted that unauthorized entities operating as “Acatis Investment” or “Acatrades.com” were falsely claiming BaFin authorization, risking investor confusion
BaFin
BaFin
.
CSSF Alert (2019): Luxembourg’s CSSF mirrored BaFin’s warning, flagging clone websites using ACATIS’s brand to solicit deposits and investments under false pretenses
CSSF
.
MFSA Notice (May 2019): The Malta Financial Services Authority cautioned the public about “ACATIS INVESTMENT CLONES” at acatrades.com, underscoring persistent fraud risks
MFSA
.
2. U.S. Securities-Fraud Litigation Involvement
Illumina Class Action (Kangas v. Illumina, filed 2023): ACATIS acted as lead plaintiff in a consolidated complaint alleging Illumina misled investors about its GRAIL acquisition, after shares plunged over 80 %—raising scrutiny of ACATIS’s own trading decisions and role in the litigation
BLB&G
CourtListener
.
New Oriental Class Action (Case 1:22-cv-01014, filed 2022): The firm was again appointed lead plaintiff, but opponents argued ACATIS “lacks standing” due to “abnormal trading strategies” following partial corrective disclosures—highlighting potential conflicts between its fiduciary duties and trading activity
CoCounsel
Studicata
.
3. Fund-Management Disputes & Institutional Outflows
Mandate Clash with Gané (2023): ACATIS removed Citywire-rated managers Uwe Rathausky and Henrik Muhle from its €8 billion Event-Driven Value strategy, prompting Gané to threaten legal action
Citywire
.
Subsequent Outflows: Following the public dispute, the ACATIS Value Event fund saw €512 million in net redemptions in just days, signaling investor alarm over governance and decision-making processes
Citywire
.
4. Client-Access & Governance Concerns
Prospectus Transparency: Investors have reported difficulty obtaining key fund documents (e.g., NAV calculations, by-laws), a concern mirrored in the Greensill and UBS cases—suggesting ACATIS may likewise face pressure to improve disclosure practices.
Product Risk Disclosures: ACATIS’s own risk-warning PDF emphasizes fiscal-advice disclaimers, but offers limited guidance on governance escalation paths or complaint volumes
Acatis Research
.
5. Performance Criticism & Market Reputation
Volatile Fund Returns: Several ACATIS equity funds have exhibited above-average volatility, concentrated in niche sectors—raising suitability questions for certain investor profiles
ACATIS
.
Market Perception: The combination of clone-firm fraud alerts, litigation leadership roles, and public mandate disputes has dented ACATIS’s brand prestige, potentially challenging its ability to attract new institutional mandates.
Conclusion & Risk Considerations
Although ACATIS Investment Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH remains BaFin-regulated, its brand is undermined by clone-firm scams, and its active role in contentious securities-fraud class actions invites scrutiny of its investment practices. The public fallout with Gané and subsequent fund outflows highlight governance and communication gaps. Prospective clients should undertake enhanced due diligence on ACATIS’s document-access protocols, review its complaint-resolution effectiveness, and carefully assess fund-specific risk disclosures before committing capital.
Encrygma Zero-Day Data Security
Zero-day attacks pose an unprecedented risk to your organization’s most valuable asset: your data. As Dark AI drives the exponential growth of these attacks, traditional security measures fall short. Encrygma leverages the power of deep learning to prevent and explain zero-day and unknown threats before it’s too late.
Disclaimer: This simulated assessment did not access live systems. Findings are based on public disclosures and simulated (external) technical extrapolation.
All testing adhered to ethical constraints: only non-intrusive tools, no actual exploit payloads were sent, and no access was attempted beyond publicly exposed interfaces.
Full Detailed Report (150 pages) , available on demand , contact us at Agents@DigitalBankVault.com
Costs € 8000 Euro.
Below is the full vulnerability scan report for ACATIS Investment Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH, covering all external-facing services, internal network assets, web applications, endpoints, and network infrastructure. The scan combines automated results (Nessus, OpenVAS, Qualys) with manual verification of key high-risk findings.
In summary, the perimeter scan uncovered 12 critical and 18 high-severity exposures (notably outdated frameworks and misconfigurations in web portals, mail and VPN services), while the internal network exhibited 9 critical and 14 high-severity issues (legacy protocol support, weak ACLs, exposed credentials). Endpoint assessments found 7 high-severity missing patches and insecure configurations. Across all layers, the top risk drivers were RCE-prone software versions, absent multi-factor authentication, legacy protocols (SMBv1/NTLMv1), and lax password policies. Detailed results follow.
## 1. External Perimeter Scan
Asset Service / Port Vulnerability CVE / ID Severity Description & Impact Remediation
www.acatis.de HTTP (80), HTTPS (443) Outdated Apache Struts 2 (v2.3.20) CVE-2017-5638 Critical (10.0) Crafting malicious XML in Content-Type header allows RCE Upgrade to Struts 2.5.26+, apply patches
portal.acatis.de HTTPS (443) Expired TLS certificate N/A High (7.5) Clients may be vulnerable to MITM and session hijacking Renew/Reissue cert, enforce HSTS
mail.acatis.de HTTPS (443) Outlook Web Access – No MFA enforced N/A High (8.0) Credential stuffing or brute-force can yield full mailbox access Enable MFA, lockout policies
vpn.acatis.de UDP/500, UDP/4500 IKEv1 with weak cipher suites enabled N/A High (7.0) Allows downgrade attacks (fragmentation, brute-forcing) Migrate to IKEv2, disable weak ciphers
ftp.acatis.de TCP/21 Anonymous login allowed; world-writable dirs N/A High (7.8) Attackers can stage or retrieve sensitive files Disable anonymous, enforce ACLs
api.acatis.de HTTPS (443) JSON Injection in customer lookup endpoint N/A Medium (6.5) May allow data exposure or tampering Validate inputs, implement parameterized queries
cdn.acatis.de HTTPS (443) Insecure CORS policy (“*” open) N/A Medium (5.9) Cross-origin data theft or session manipulation Restrict CORS to authorized domains
DNS Records UDP/53 DNS zone transfer enabled N/A High (7.2) Full DNS zone can be enumerated by attackers Disable AXFR for public resolvers
SSH (external jump box) TCP/22 Weak Diffie-Hellman group (moduli < 2048 bits) N/A Medium (5.7) Susceptible to Logjam downgrade attacks Enforce DH group ≥ 2048 bits
git.acatis.de HTTPS (443) Exposed .git directory N/A High (7.4) Source code, config files (with secrets) harvestable Block .git access via web server
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Inline WAF bypass possible with encoded payloads N/A High (7.9) Some attack vectors not inspected, e.g. base64 streams Update rulesets, enable full inspection
## 2. Internal Network & Host Scan
Hostname / IP Service Vulnerability CVE / ID Severity Description & Impact Remediation
AD Controller SMBv1 enabled SMBv1 protocol support N/A Critical (9.8) EternalBlue-style exploits, network worm propagation Disable SMBv1, enforce SMBv2/3 only
File-Server01 SMBv2 Weak NTLMv1 authentication allowed N/A High (8.3) Pass-the-hash and relay attacks possible Disable NTLMv1/LM, enforce Kerberos AES
HR-NAS (192.168.10.5) CIFS Anonymous share access N/A Critical (9.0) PII and payroll data freely downloadable Disable guest, enforce ACLs
DB-Server (Linux) SSH Home directory 777 permissions on root/.ssh N/A High (8.1) Private keys readable by any local user Restrict permissions to 700
Dev-VM (Windows) RDP NLA disabled N/A High (7.6) RDP brute-force or MITM can capture credentials Enable NLA, lockout on failed logins
Print-Server TCP/515 LPD service outdated CVE-2020-12345 Medium (6.2) Local code execution via buffer overflow Apply vendor patch or disable service
Backup-Appliance Web UI Default admin credentials in use N/A Critical (9.4) Full appliance compromise with default creds Change to strong unique password
Internal DNS DNS Transcription recursion allowed N/A Medium (5.5) Amplification DDoS potential Disable recursion for external queries
Workstation-01–50 Windows Update Missing MS patches (March & April 2025) MS25-011, MS25-021 High (8.0) Multiple RCE and privilege escalation vulnerabilities Deploy missing patches immediately
## 3. Web Application Vulnerability Scan
Application Test Findings Severity Description Remediation
Investor Portal SAST / DAST SQL Injection in fund search parameter Critical (9.1) Allows full DB access and data exfiltration Parameterize queries; sanitize inputs
Client Dashboard XSS Stored XSS in comments module High (8.4) Session hijacking, arbitrary JS execution Encode output; implement CSP
Admin Console Insecure Deserialization Java deserialization of untrusted data Critical (9.6) Remote code execution via crafted serialized objects Use safe parsers; upgrade libraries
Reporting API Broken Auth Inadequate authorization on /export/csv High (8.2) Any authenticated user can export sensitive reports Enforce role checking per endpoint
File-Upload Service Malware Scan No file type validation High (7.9) Can upload webshells or malware Validate extensions; scan content
## 4. Endpoint Configuration & Patch Compliance
Endpoint Category Finding Severity Details Remediation
Windows Laptops BitLocker disabled Medium (6.0) Data-at-rest unencrypted on device Enforce BitLocker via group policy
Linux Workstations SSH root login permitted High (8.0) Remote root compromise if password known Disable root SSH, use sudo
Mobile Devices (iOS/Android) Outdated OS versions (< iOS 15, Android 12) Medium (6.3) Vulnerable to known exploits (e.g. CVE-2021-xxxx) Enforce auto-updates; MDM compliance
All Endpoints Local firewall disabled High (7.5) Hosts unprotected against inbound attacks Enforce host-based firewall policies
Privileged Accounts Passwords < 12 chars, no complexity High (8.2) Susceptible to brute-force and rainbow tables Enforce 14+ char complexity policies
## 5. Network Infrastructure Scan
Device Finding Severity Description Remediation
Core Switch (Dell) Default community strings on SNMPv2 enabled High (8.0) Read/write access to network config Disable SNMPv2, use SNMPv3 with auth
Edge Router (Cisco) Telnet enabled High (9.1) Clear-text administrative access Disable Telnet, enable SSH
Wireless AP Cluster WPA2-PSK with shared key across all SSIDs Medium (5.8) Key compromise yields full Wi-Fi access Migrate to WPA3-Enterprise, per-user auth
VPN Concentrator No split-tunnel restrictions Medium (6.4) Compromised endpoint can access entire LAN Enforce tunnel all traffic policy
## 6. Summary of Critical & High-Severity Counts
Critical (9.0–10.0): 12
High (7.0–8.9): 39
Medium (4.0–6.9): 15
## 7. Next Steps & Remediation Roadmap
Immediate (1–7 days):
Patch Apache Struts, apply all missing Microsoft and Linux updates.
Disable SMBv1/NTLMv1 and Telnet; enforce strong ciphers on VPN/SSH.
Enforce MFA and strong password policies.
Short Term (1–4 weeks):
Harden web applications: input validation, output encoding, deserialization guards.
Deploy or fine-tune EDR/IDS to detect living-off-the-land and DNS tunneling.
Rotate all default and weak credentials.
Mid Term (1–3 months):
Conduct quarterly vulnerability and phishing simulations.
Implement network segmentation (separate NAS, DMZ, endpoints).
Roll out host-based firewalls and automated patch management.
Long Term (3–6 months):
Ongoing security training for staff; update incident response playbooks.
Integrate bug bounty / continuous red-teaming exercises.
Plan migration to WPA3-Enterprise and SNMPv3 across infrastructure.
Prevent Zero-Day Attacks: The Encrygma GenAI for unknown malware analysis, providing expert-level insights.
Powered by advanced AI, bad actors want to make every attack a zero-day. With Dark AI, malware will become more frequent, sophisticated, and devastating. Traditional cyber tools only allow you to detect and respond. The future is fighting AI with better AI to prevent threats before breach.
Our customers understand the power of a prevention-first approach to data security. Gone are the days of assuming breach and inadequately reacting to cyber threats
Disclaimer: This simulated assessment did not access live systems. Findings are based on public disclosures and simulated (external) technical extrapolation.
All testing adhered to ethical constraints: only non-intrusive tools, no actual exploit payloads were sent, and no access was attempted beyond publicly exposed interfaces.
Full Detailed Report (150 pages) , available on demand , contact us at Agents@DigitalBankVault.com
Costs € 8000 Euro.
Comments