top of page

#Encrochat: EXCLUSIVE: Groundbreaking Forensic Evidence Challenges Legality of EncroChat and SkyECC-Based Convictions Across Europe. Contact Confidentially: agents@DigitalBankVault.com

  • Writer: The DigitalBank Vault
    The DigitalBank Vault
  • Apr 25
  • 3 min read




Thousands of criminal convictions across Europe—many handed down without the opportunity for proper scrutiny—may now stand on legally unstable ground. At the heart of this unfolding legal crisis are the encrypted communications platforms EncroChat and SkyECC, both of which were infiltrated through covert operations that are now being exposed as procedurally unlawful and forensically unsound.


Today, a growing alliance of respected forensic specialists, digital surveillance experts, and constitutional lawyers are raising serious concerns over how these messages were collected—and used—in courtrooms across the continent. The evidence they present is not speculative. It is documented, submitted, and—most importantly—already producing legal reversals in European courts.


⚠️ The Alarming Reality: Illegally Obtained Evidence


Independent technical reviews have concluded that both EncroChat and SkyECC systems were compromised through unauthorized firmware alterations and surveillance tactics that bypassed judicial oversight.


These techniques not only violated national laws, but also breached EU-level directives and the European Convention on Human Rights—particularly the right to a fair trial (Article 6).


Key findings include:


Lack of judicial warrants or transparency surrounding the hacking operations.


Use of unlawful interception methods incompatible with lawful surveillance frameworks.


Failure to preserve a reliable chain of custody for intercepted messages.


Deliberate withholding of technical details from both defense counsel and judges.


📚 Legal Systems Are Responding


Courts across Europe have already acknowledged these grave breaches:


In Italy, prosecutions based on EncroChat data were thrown out due to the unlawful nature of the evidence.


In Germany, constitutional courts ruled that data obtained through unauthorized surveillance could not form the basis for conviction.


In Switzerland, EncroChat-based prosecutions were blocked, citing fundamental violations of evidentiary standards.


And now, similar concerns are mounting regarding SkyECC, which was targeted using equally questionable techniques—many of which remain undisclosed to the public or the courts.


What This Means for Convicted Individuals


If you or someone you know was convicted based primarily on EncroChat or SkyECC communications, this new evidence could be grounds for an appeal, retrial, or full exoneration. These cases often rest solely on intercepted messages—messages now proven to be forensically invalid and legally inadmissible.


At DigitalBankVault, we have the tools and expertise to help:


Detailed forensic documentation proving unlawful interception.


Expert witness support and sworn declarations.


Strategic assistance with legal filings, appeals, and motions.


Guidance tailored to defense attorneys, appellate courts, and human rights bodies.


🛡️ Upholding Justice and Due Process


We are not here to obstruct justice—we are here to ensure it is conducted lawfully, ethically, and transparently. No conviction should be secured through secretive surveillance, manipulated evidence, or violations of constitutional rights.


We are calling on:


Defense lawyers to review all cases involving EncroChat and SkyECC data.


Families of the convicted to seek second opinions on the legitimacy of the evidence.


Civil rights organizations, bar associations, and journalists to shine a light on the full scope of this issue.


Confidential Legal Support


If you are an attorney, investigator, journalist, or family member representing someone convicted on the basis of EncroChat or SkyECC messages, we invite you to contact us for a confidential briefing and access to our forensic findings.


📧 Email us today at: agents@DigitalBankVault.com


All communications are handled with the utmost confidentiality and professional discretion.


Justice must be based on law—not shortcuts. It must be earned with truth—not secrecy. Let’s restore integrity to the courtroom. Together.









 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page