top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe DigitalBank Vault

#Encrochat Trials: Conclusions and the Future of EncroChat Cases

Following the present judgment, it is likely we will see further EncroChat-related prosecutions as appetite to prosecute can only increase. For those prosecuting or defending EncroChat-related cases in the future, there are two immediate conclusions to be considered.

The first relates to any argument for exclusion of such material under s.78 PACE. The Court of Appeal has upheld Mr Justice Dove's judgment in R v Coggins (2020), Liverpool Crown Court, unreported, that EncroChat messages ought not to be excluded under S.78 of PACE, or for any arguments of abuse of process.

Defense teams should pay heed to the Court of Appeal's warning: “If it is intended to repeat this kind of process in other pending cases involving EncroChat material, those involved should not be surprised if the trial judges deal with them rather more briskly” (at [6]).

A further consideration for defence teams lies in recent judgments surrounding EncroChat and sentencing. In the case of R v Nelson & Markham[2020] EWCA Crim 718, confirmed in R v English & Read [2020] EWCA Crim 100, the Court of Appeal ruled the use of encrypted devices by drug dealers to be an aggravating factor, reflecting the sophistication of the organization.

Whilst questions may remain about whether the court may entertain further challenges based on the reliability of material obtained from the EncroChat system what is now clear is that, where the prosecution has lawfully obtained data which has been stored on handsets, whether as draft communications or otherwise, those messages are admissible.

A broader question for consideration is whether we have now reached a point, notwithstanding the relatively recent introduction of the IPA, where Parliament should legislate to allow the more general admission of intercept evidence within an appropriate statutory framework?



Offline “ Air Gapped” Super Encryption Mobile Machines.

Ultra Encrypted Text Messaging with No Cellular or Internet Connection. No Servers.

Encryption Keys generated offline by the user , never exchanged with third parties and erased permanently after each session.

More Secure than a Face To Face Meeting.

More details?

Consult with our

Cyber Defense Experts at :


Offline “ Air Gapped” Super Encryption Mobile Machines.


Offline “ Air Gapped” Super Encryption Mobile Machines.

Full technical details:

ENCRYGMA Mobile Encryption Machine Specs
Download PDF • 1.76MB

Cyber War Grade, Mathematically UnCrackable, Quantum Safe, Air Gapped (Offline) Encryption Machines More details ? Click here: .

“ If you need to communicate top classified information or you need to store secret data and be absolutely sure that no state-sponsored hackers, no foreign Governments , no intelligence agencies will be ever able to decipher the files, you need an Above Military Level Offline SuperEncryption System” 

Cyber War Ultra Encrypted Communications.

This is an encrypted text message, that has been encrypted with an OTP cipher (quantum safe encryption- mathematically unbreakable) , on a DBV “ Air Gapped “ Offline SuperEncryption Machine. The Encrypted message is then exported from the offline device by visual means( no connections , not even physical) by scanning the QR code with an online device for then sending it safely online.

The QR code at is arrival, is scanned by the second DBV offline encryption machine , directly from the receiving online device. Afterwards , it’s deciphered safely offline. This form of super encrypted offline communications is safer than a face to face meeting .

More details? Consult with our cyber defense advisors at or visit

102 views0 comments


bottom of page