top of page
  • Writer's pictureThe DigitalBank Vault

One very important loophole to be used against #Encrochat convictions

Parliament heard last year that the findings of the 2014 review remain valid. ‘It is not possible to find a practical way to allow the use of intercept evidence in court,’ home office minister Baroness Williams of Trafford said.

Of course, as the EncroChat convictions (and ongoing criminal trials) suggest, it is sometimes possible to admit intercepts as evidence in English courts. One loophole, cited by His Honour Peter Ross in a letter to The Times, is where evidence has been obtained lawfully overseas. He referred to a drugs case where, ‘as the evidence was properly obtained according to Dutch law and admissible in their courts, I ruled it could be adduced in the trial’. The Court of Appeal agreed, he noted, describing the UK’s position as ‘nonsensical’.

At least some of the EncroChat prosecutions face the difficulty that material was obtained in the UK. The lawfulness of its admission has already been challenged. However, in A, B, D & C v Regina [2021] the Court of Appeal found last year that such material could be admitted because it was not, under the terms of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, ‘being transmitted’ when it was collected. This relied on the technicalities of the EncroChat app and that it stored messages in smartphones’ RAM before encryption and transmission.

However, a policy change may be in the air. Official enthusiasm about the EncroChat trove has eroded the decades-old policy of extreme secrecy about signals intelligence. (The secret of Bletchley Park (pictured above) was kept until the 1970s; current guidance on telecommunications interception remains ‘neither confirm nor deny’.)

One argument for change is that admitting intercept material as evidence will force more transparency on the process and thus build public confidence. Up to now, this argument has failed to persuade the powers that be. But earlier this month, a former legal director of MI5 and MI6 entered the debate.

In a letter to The Times, David Bickford wrote: ‘I have never seen a sustainable reason against the use of intercepts as evidence in cases of serious crime, including terrorism.’ The costs argument, he said, ‘fails in the face of the heavy economic damage that can be wreaked by serious criminals and terrorists’.


Our Cyber Defense Engineers provide clients with the most advanced know how and sophisticated encryption technologies for securing their top secret corporate communications, classified file transfers and sensitive data storage. We invite to to consult with us for Free.  

Start Your Own Business of Encrypted Phones & Laptops with just $ 5K ! Telegram/Signal/ WhatsApp +37257347873  or ENCRYGMA.COM


The Encrygma Yearly Program 

Own your Private Encrypted Communication Network : 



✅ UNLIMITED MOBILE & DESKTOP ENCRYPTION MACHINES: Yearly License plan for unlimited installs of the Encrygma Offline Encryption System , on Android devices and Windows PCs ( you can install it on how many devices you want )

✅ UNLIMITED ENCRYPTED PHONES & ENCRYPTED LAPTOPS :  Yearly License plan for unlimited installs of the Avvo.Club  the online Peer to Peer Ultra Encrypted Communication Network on any iPhone, Android, MacBook and  and Windows PCs 

✅ For Each Client a Private , Unique Offline Encryption System and Private Real Time Communication Network with a dedicated set of encryption algorithms, creating like that a fully privately owned , fully controlled internal, super encrypted communication network.    

✅ Personal, Professional online training of the company's team to quantum safe encryption methodologies and top classified, ultra encrypted communications. 

✅ One year , 24/7 Full Online Technical Support + Private Consulting + Online Covert Communications courses + Ongoing upgrades and maintenance .

Let us know your secrecy needs !

We are here to help you achieve absolute secrecy.


Consult with us today for free on : 

or on Whatsapp/ Telegram/ Signal at 


39 views0 comments


bottom of page